Category Archives: Insurance Coverage

Ohio Appellate Court Applies Triggering-Event Theory of Occurrence, Annualization of Policy Limits in Asbestos Coverage Matter Court of Appeals of Ohio, First Appellate District, Hamilton County, December 14, 2016

The William Powell Company makes industrial valves. Some valves manufactured before 1987 contained asbestos. In 2001, Powell began receiving personal-injury claims emanating from asbestos exposures involving its products. Faced with potentially thousands of claims, Powell sought defense and indemnification under various insurance policies. At issue here were occurrence-based policies that were written by a predecessor to OneBeacon Insurance Company between 1955 and 1977. OneBeacon asked the court to define “occurrence” as used in the policies as Powell’s decision to manufacture valves containing asbestos without providing…

Continue Reading....

Bankruptcy Injunction Extends to Debtor’s Insurers U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, October 17, 2016

W.R. Grace & Co. (Grace), a Chapter 11 bankruptcy debtor, at one time operated a vermiculite mine, and related mining activities released asbestos-containing dust into the atmosphere. It began facing asbestos-related lawsuits in the 1970s. Grace filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2001, and a plan of reorganization was confirmed in 2014. The plan created a trust for the payment of asbestos personal injury claims. As part of a settlement agreement, one of Grace’s liability, excess, and workers’ compensation insurers, Continental Casualty Company and…

Continue Reading....

Pro Rata Allocation and Exposure Trigger Confirmed in New York Federal Court Decision for Insurers U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, September 29, 2016

Troy Belting & Supply Co. was named as a defendant in lawsuits alleging bodily injury caused by exposure to asbestos from products it manufactured. It became involved in a dispute with its insurers over coverage for the costs of settling such lawsuits. Pacific Employers provided coverage for Troy Belting from 1974 to 1984, and various Hartford Insurance Company entities provided coverage from 1984 to 1992. Pacific Employers and Hartford sought reimbursement from Troy Belting for cases where they paid 100 percent of the settlement costs…

Continue Reading....

Delaware Justices: Asbestos Injury Triggers Coverage Continually from First Significant Exposure Supreme Court of Delaware, September 12, 2016

The Delaware Supreme Court took up several issues in the ongoing dispute between plaintiffs, Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC, and various insurers who issued excess policies to Viking and Warren’s predecessor, Houdaille Industries, Inc. between 1972 and 1985 (the Excess Insurers). Houdaille, and later Viking and Warren, manufactured pumps containing asbestos, and a multitude of claims against Viking and Warren related to asbestos exposure have given rise to a lengthy dispute between Viking and Warren and their insurers. In the present decision, the…

Continue Reading....

Court Rules Summary Judgment Not Appropriate Due to Ambiguity on How Non-Cumulation Clause Operated U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, August 5, 2016

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company issued successive annual insurance policies to the Fairbanks Company from January 1, 1974 to January 1, 1982. Liberty issued both comprehensive general liability and umbrella policies. Multiple lawsuits were filed in several jurisdictions against Fairbanks, alleging injuries due to exposure to asbestos, and this coverage litigation resulted. On March 21, 2016, the court ruled on Liberty’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the policies were subject to pro rata allocation such that Liberty was only liable to indemnify Fairbanks for the…

Continue Reading....

No Liability Coverage Allocation for Manufacturers Who Continued Making Products with Asbestos After 1987 N.J. App. Ct. July 20, 2016

  A New Jersey appellate court held that policyholders who continued to manufacture products containing asbestos after 1987 — when coverage for injuries arising from such products was no longer available — need not shoulder any portion of liability for injuries related to asbestos exposure from their products, so long as any portion of such exposure occurred prior to 1987. The Bendix Corporation, predecessor of Honeywell International, Inc., manufactured and sold brake and clutch pads that contained asbestos. Honeywell has been sued in tens of…

Continue Reading....

New York Court of Appeals Opts for “All Sums” Allocation in Asbestos Coverage Case Supreme Court of New York, New York County, April 18, 2016

In a landmark ruling, the New York Court of Appeals held that “all sums” allocation and vertical exhaustion applied in a case involving coverage for injuries related to asbestos exposure. The court based its holding on the language of the insurance policies, which included non-cumulation clauses or non-cumulation and prior insurance provisions. The plaintiffs, Viking Pumps, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC acquired pump manufacturing businesses from Houdaille Industries in the 1980s. These acquisitions later subjected Viking and Warren to significant potential liability in connection with…

Continue Reading....

Court Sides with Insurers; Rules Pro Rate Approach Applies on Liability Costs U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, March 21, 2016

The case involves two consolidated lawsuits — one from the federal district court for the Southern District of New York, and another from Georgia state court. The Georgia state court action was removed to federal court and then transferred to the Southern District of New York. This lawsuits concern insurance coverage for The Fairbanks Company for liability arising from asbestos-related personal injury actions. Prior to 1984, Fairbanks manufactured packings and gaskets that contained asbestos. Fairbanks entered into insurance policies with several insurers, including Liberty, between…

Continue Reading....

Court Rules Insurer Has Duty to Pay Defense and Indemnification Costs of Asbestos Claims U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, February 29, 2016

Liberty Mutual had a duty to pay defense and indemnity costs for a variety of asbestos-related cases filed nationwide against its insured, York International Corporation, and York Corporation, the insured’s predecessor. Liberty Mutual had elected not to defend the underlying lawsuits or file a declaratory judgment action regarding coverage, and the underlying suits were settled by the insured. The insured then submitted the complaints in the underlying cases and invoices for defense and indemnity costs to Liberty Mutual. In this case, the court ruled on…

Continue Reading....

Massachusetts Court Grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in Case Where Plaintiff Sought Reimbursement for Litigation Expenses in Asbestos-Related Cases U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, February 5, 2016

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund could not pierce the corporate veil or impose successor liability on a corporation that purchased the assets of another corporation, which was the subject of workplace injury claims based on exposure to asbestos and whose liability insurers had become insolvent. Beacon Sales Company, Inc. (BSC) sold nearly all of its assets to the defendant Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc., (BSAI) a subsidiary of defendant Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. (BRS), in…

Continue Reading....