Business and lawyers discussing contract papers with brass scale on desk

Plaintiffs Succeed in Motion to Remand Case to State Court

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Central District of California

Decedent David L. Dunlavey worked as a pipefitter and steamfitter from 1967 to 2006 — including time spent around 1970 working as a pipefitter for University Mechanical and performing work for National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (NASSCO). 

His employment required him to handle asbestos-containing materials and products in the service, maintenance, repair, installation, removal, and disposal of various piping and boilers systems. Decedent was diagnosed with mesothelioma and his estate brought a wrongful death action …

Continue Reading
Wooden judge gavel, close-up view.

Union Carbide Prevails in Rare Rhode Island Asbestos Trial

Plaintiff Bonito brought this asbestos action based on her diagnosis of, and eventual passing from, mesothelioma.

Plaintiff alleged exposure from laundering her husband’s clothes from approximately 1966 to the1990s. Mr. Bonito worked at various jobs during that time.

There were two defendants who took the case to trial. Union Carbide and Graybar Electric Co. Inc. made motions to exclude the plaintiff’s experts, which were subsequently denied. Despite the adverse ruling on the motion, the case went to trial against Union Carbide.

After nine days of …

Continue Reading
EPA Offices, Washington DC

EPA Announces Part 2 of Final Rule to Prohibit Asbestos Use in the United States

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 3 issued Part 2 of a final risk determination providing an overview of the hazards of asbestos “to workers in certain conditions.” The agency will soon begin the risk management process to address the “unreasonable risk” associated with legacy use and associated disposal of asbestos. 

EPA announced previously Part 1 of the final rule in March. That initial section banned the use and import of chrysotile asbestos under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Although there are several …

Continue Reading
The law concept background.

Court Awards $7.5 Million in Punitive Damages to Connecticut Plaintiff

Jurisdiction: Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Bridgeport at Bridgeport

Decedent Nicolas Barone was diagnosed with mesothelioma in May 2022. His surviving spouse, Kathryn Barone (plaintiff)brought suit in September 2023, following her husband’s death in June of that year. Plaintiff’s third amended complaint alleged the cause of plaintiff’s mesothelioma was asbestos exposure from talc supplied by defendant International Talc Company and its successor, Vanderbilt Minerals LLC. After a four-week trial, the jury reached a unanimous verdict and found Vanderbilt liable for a total of $15 million in …

Continue Reading
Business and lawyers discussing contract papers with brass scale on desk

Court Denies Valve Manufacturers Summary Judgment Motion

Supreme Court of New York, New York County

Plaintiff Raymond Lee, as administrator for the estate of the decedent, Jim Lee filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County alleging decedent was exposed to asbestos from his’s employment working around various products. Defendant, Crosby Valves, filed a motion for summary judgement to dismiss the claims against them.

A court must grant summary judgment if the movant establishes its claim “as a matter of law” and no “issue of fact” warranting …

Continue Reading
Courtroom, Gavel And Law Books

Court Denies Valve Manufacturer’s Summary Judgment Motion

Supreme Court of New York, New York County

In this asbestos action, Plaintiff Jane E. Wixted, as executrix for the estate of the decedent, Thomas N. Wixted (“Decedent”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County allegingDecedent was exposed to asbestos from his employment working around various products. Defendant, Crosby Valves, filed a Motion for Summary Judgement to dismiss the claims against them.

A court must grant summary judgment if the movant establishes its claim “as a matter of law” …

Continue Reading
judge's gavel and books

New York Court Grants Valve Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

Court:  Supreme Court of New York State, Erie County

Plaintiff Ronald McInnis worked as a career union pipefitter from the 1970s-2010s. A native of Chatham, New Brunswick, plaintiff spent the vast majority of his career working at various paper mills, chemical plants, refineries, and power plants throughout New Brunswick, Ontario, and parts of Alberta, Canada. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in October 2023 and initiated a lawsuit in Erie County Supreme Court in Upstate New York.

Plaintiff alleged that his work during shutdown or refurbishing periods at …

Continue Reading
Wooden judge gavel, close-up view.

Court Rules Pro Se Plaintiff’s Deliberate Indifference Claim Actionable

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

This is a prisoner civil-rights case filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, regarding the conditions of confinement in Huntingdon State Correctional Institution (SCI-Huntingdon). The case was originally filed as a putative class action by three individual pro-se plaintiffs on behalf of a class of Huntingdon State Correctional Institution inmates. The court dismissed the class complaint and granted the remaining individual plaintiffs, Bobby Kenneth Williamson and Antonio Bundy, leave to amend their individual claims. They filed two …

Continue Reading
Law theme. Judge chamber.

California Jury Finds for Asbestos Defendant in Friction Products Case

Court: California Superior Court, Los Angeles County

In this asbestos action, plaintiffs Leon Solis Jr., Laura Rangel, Crystal Solis and Leon Solis filed suit claiming negligence against several defendants, including Brake Parts Inc., in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Plaintiffs alleged Sylvia Solis contracted mesothelioma from asbestos exposure, resulting in Ms. Solis’s death.

The case went to jury trial Oct. 4 against Brake Parts as the only remaining defendant. Plaintiffs claimed Brake Parts allegedly created brakes by attaching asbestos linings to metal shoes. At trial, the …

Continue Reading
Gavel with books

Connecticut Jury Awards $15 Million Talc Verdict against Johnson & Johnson Entities

Court: Connecticut Superior Court – Fairfield at Bridgeport County

In this asbestos action, Plaintiffs Evan Plotkin and Martha Barry-Plotkin filed suit claiming Mr. Plotkin had asbestos exposure from, among other things, personal use of Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder from the 1950s through the 2000s. 

Plaintiffs alleged that Johnson & Johnson owned the Vermont talc mines that were the source of the asbestos exposure, which resulted in Mr. Plotkin to develop mesothelioma. The lawsuit eventually encompassed J&J and its entities that were created by J&J through …

Continue Reading