The plaintiff, Janet Stimson, filed a Motion for Reargument on behalf of her husband, Gary Stimson, following the court’s decision granting summary judgment on behalf of the defendant, J-MM, on the issue of product identification.
The plaintiff alleged that
- The court misapprehended the facts relevant to the decedent’s identification of J-MM’s A/C pipe
- The deposition testimony of a J-MM employee from an unrelated 2014 case constitutes newly discovered evidence that creates a genuine issue of material fact regarding product identification
The court was also provided …
Continue Reading