Asbestos Case Tracker

September 1, 2023 Bankruptcy Trusts

2023 Second Quarterly Asbestos Bankruptcy Trust Alert

Many bankruptcy trusts expanded their approved jobsite lists in the second quarter of 2023, allowing compensation for more individuals who claim to have an asbestos-related injury. However, as can be seen below, many trusts also have decreased their payment percentages. In fact, only two bankruptcy trusts have increased their payment percentages during the 2^nd quarter of 2023, while five bankruptcy trusts decreased their payment percentages.

The cause of the decreased payment percentages is mostly likely due to rising costs of inflation and an increase …

Close up of Male lawyer or judge hand's striking the gavel on sounding block, working with Law books, report the case on table in modern office, Law and justice concept

Posted by: Quincy Conrad

Court Issues Final Orders Regarding Various Motions of Automotive Defendants

Jurisdiction: Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

Defendants Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Morse Tec LLC, and American Honda Motor Co. Inc. filed various motions for summary judgment, or in the alternative summary adjudication, against the plaintiff Samson Bareh’s claims that he was exposed to asbestos from their products. In addition, the defendant, Volkswagen Group of America Inc., filed a motion to compel discovery.

Mercedes-Benz filed a motion for summary adjudication of the strict liability, negligence, and fraud causes of action, as well as the …

September 22, 2023 Adjudication / California / Summary Judgment

Posted by: Kerry L. Jones

Summary Judgment and Adjudication Motions Filed by Three Automotive Product Defendants; Some Granted and Some Denied

Jurisdiction: Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

In this asbestos action, three defendants filed motions for summary judgment, and in some cases, in the alternative, motions for summary adjudication, against plaintiff Ronald Carpenter’s claims that he was exposed to asbestos from their products.

First, defendant ZF Active Safety US Inc. argued that plaintiffs had no evidence that Carpenter was exposed to any asbestos-containing parts from ZF Active Safety. Specifically, ZF Active Safety served interrogatories asking plaintiffs to identify people with knowledge that Carpenter was …

September 22, 2023 New York

Posted by: Elizabeth M. Lautenbach

NYCAL Judge Grants Joint Trial of Two Asbestos Cases

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

In this asbestos action, plaintiffs seek to join the Munna and LaMonica cases for joint trial. First, the court noted that the NYCAL CMO provides that two cases may be joined for joint trial if the plaintiffs can meet the Malcolm factors. However, the plaintiffs do not need to meet all of the factors for the court to join the cases for trial. The Malcolm factors include:

(1) common worksites;

(2) similar occupation;

(3) similar time …

Business and lawyers discussing contract papers with brass scale on desk

September 21, 2023 Move to Remand / New York / Remand/Removal

Posted by: Jillian E. Madison

Talc Manufacturer’s Removal Motion Denied Joinder; Case Remanded to State Court

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; September 18, 2023

Plaintiff Ann Greenberg’s asbestos-related lawsuit against defendants Johnson & Johnson and Kolmar Laboratories asserts that she contracted an asbestos-related disease from her use of Johnson’s Baby Powder, whichshe alleged contained asbestos-contaminated talc.

Johnson & Johnson filed a motion to remove the action to federal court on August 27, 2021, invoking diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff opposed, and Johnson & Johnson filed a timely reply alleging the …

September 20, 2023 New York / Summary Judgment

Posted by: Jillian E. Madison

Defendant Denied Summary Judgment on Punitive Damages for Failure to Provide Case-Specific Support

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

Plaintiff Kevin Burns filed an asbestos-related lawsuit against numerous defendants, including Burnham, testifying that while he worked as a plumber he was exposed to asbestos insulation and rope from the removal and installation of Burnham boilers from approximately 1958 to the early 1980s.

Burnham moved for summary judgment on plaintiff’s punitive-damages claim, arguing that plaintiff failed to establish Burnham’s conduct rose to the level of egregious and morally culpable conduct necessary for an award of punitive damages. …

September 20, 2023 New York / Summary Judgment

Posted by: Jillian E. Madison

ALCOA Denied Summary Judgment Where Question of Fact Exists

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

This action was filed on behalf of decedent, Kenneth Last, alleging he was exposed to asbestos while working for general contractor, ALCOA Inc., n/k/a ARCONIC Inc., at the World Trade Center during the 1970s. ALCOA filed a motion for summary judgment arguing the fire-proofing material used at the World Trade Center during decedent’s employment was non-asbestos containing.

The court notes that summary judgment is a drastic remedy and should only be granted if the moving party …

September 14, 2023 Summary Judgment

Posted by: Jillian E. Madison

Defendant Shipyard Unsuccessful on Summary Judgment under 5th Circuit Precedent

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Plaintiff Felton Robichaux brought this asbestos-related lawsuit claiming he was exposed to asbestos through his work as a land-based insulator and carpenter at Avondale Shipyard from 1961 to 1979. In January 2022, Robichaux was diagnosed with mesothelioma and filed the instant action in Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Robichaux brought state law tort claims against Avondale. Because Robichaux was primarily exposed to asbestos while working on United States Navy ships at Avondale Shipyard, …

September 12, 2023 Judgment

Posted by: Keani A. Christian

Court Denies Post-Trial Motions Following Plaintiff’s Verdict

Supreme Court of New York, New York County; August 28, 2023

This matter involved plaintiff James McWilliams, who worked as a steamfitter from 1960 until his retirement in 1996. He claimed that his work consisted of installing heating, air conditioning, and sprinkler systems, including the installation of new piping systems and the renovation of existing systems. This work, he alleged, required him to install, maintain, and repair valves, some of which he identified as Jenkins. In September 2018, the plaintiff was diagnosed with mesothelioma and, …

August 29, 2023 Motion for Summary Judgment / New York

Posted by: Keani A. Christian

Court Denies Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

In this matter, Rockwell Automation, Inc. sought to dismiss the action against them on grounds that the plaintiff was not exposed to asbestos from burners manufactured by its predecessor, Timken-Detroit Axle Company.

When it comes to making a determination as related to a summary judgment motion, the court’s role is “issue-finding, rather than issue-determination.” Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395, 404, 144 N.E.2d 387, 165 N.Y.S.2d 498 (1957) “The proponent of a summary …