judge's gavel and books

Putty Manufacturer and Talc Disturber’s Motion to Dismiss on Causation Grounds Denied

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County (NYCAL)

In this asbestos action, plaintiff Jennifer Peganis alleged take-home exposure to asbestos from laundering her husband’s work clothing. Defendant Donald Durham Company moved to dismiss the action on the basis that plaintiff failed to establish causation. Defendant Vanderbilt Minerals LLC jointed Durham’s motion to dismiss, arguing that Vanderbilt’s only connection to the action is due to its talc being a component ingredient in Durham’s water putty.

The moving defendants relied upon three experts: (1) Brittani …

Continue Reading
Law theme. Judge chamber.

Holding Company’s Motion to Dismiss on Personal Jurisdiction Grounds Granted

Court: Supreme Court of New York County (NYCAL)

In this asbestos action, defendant Burnham Holdings Inc. moved to dismiss the complaint against it on personal jurisdiction grounds. Specifically, BHI asserted that it is a holding company that was incorporated in Delaware with a principal place of business in Pennsylvania. BHI further argued that as a holding company, it never placed any products in the stream of commerce and thus, has no ties to the state of New York.

In opposition, plaintiff argued that BHI is …

Continue Reading
Wooden judge gavel, close-up view.

Motion for Summary Judgment Denied as Plaintiff Failed to Establish De Facto Merger Doctrine

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

This action arises out of plaintiff Hydraulic IP Holdings LLC’s attempt to enforce a judgment entered against non-party Grace Apparel LLC. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that the operation of Grace ceased, and assets were transferred to continue operation through successor entities, defendants GBrands Holding LLC and CC Apparel LLC, to avoid Grace Apparel’s creditors.

Plaintiff moved for summary judgment against defendants GBrands and CC on the first cause of action, successor liability. Defendants opposed and cross-moved for …

Continue Reading
The law concept background.

Motion for Summary Judgment Denied as Defendant Failed to Prove Lack of Causation

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

Plaintiff John P. Reeves alleges asbestos exposure from, among other things, the asbestos-containing caulk of defendant DAP Inc. while serving in the U.S. Navy aboard the USS Forrestal from 1961 to 1964. He also alleges exposure from the caulking work he performed on various occasions in his home, and from DAP asbestos-containing window glazing while renovating his home between 1966 and 1967. 

Plaintiff claims this asbestos exposure resulted in his diagnosis of lung cancer in 2019.  …

Continue Reading
Wooden judge gavel, close-up view.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Denied Due to Conclusory Affidavits

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

DAP filed a motion for summary judgment by arguing plaintiff cannot sufficiently demonstrate DAP’s exposed him to asbestos. DAP contends that it did not manufacture or sell any product that resembles the product described by plaintiff. Thus, according to DAP, plaintiff cannot establish that he was exposed to asbestosfrom its products. In support, DAP proffers, inter alia, two affidavits of Mr. Ward Treat, who contends that DAP did not manufacture, sell, or supply the products described …

Continue Reading
judge's gavel and books

Court Denies Motions for Summary Judgment for Valve and Pump Manufacturers

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County

Plaintiff Robert L. Toth worked at various Consolidated Edison powerhouses from 1961 to 1991 as a sheet metal worker. He was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2019 and he alleged his illness was the result of asbestos exposure. He brought suit against numerous pump, valve, and gasket companies amongst other industrial manufacturers. Defendants Crosby Valve LLC and Milton Roy Company — (collectively “defendants”) — both moved for summary judgment. They argued plaintiff failed to identify either as a manufacturer of …

Continue Reading
Business and lawyers discussing contract papers with brass scale on desk

Talc Defendant Unsuccessful on Summary Judgment

Jurisdiction:  Supreme Court of New York, New York County

Plaintiff Lita Goldstein was diagnosed in March 2022 with mesothelioma.  She initiated a suit against several defendants in May 2022, including Kolmar Laboratories Inc. Kolmar moved for summary judgment on two points. First, it argued plaintiff failed to establish she was exposed to any asbestos-containing product manufactured by Kolmar.  Second, Kolmar argued that any such product it had manufactured was done so per the specifications of Johnson & Johnson and as such, Kolmar could not be liable. …

Continue Reading
Wooden judge gavel, close-up view.

Summary Judgment Denied as to U.S. Navy Ship Product Suppliers; Court Determines Florida Law Applies

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Plaintiff Leona Rhoades, on behalf of the estate of her husband, Dewey T. Rhoades, commenced this action against a variety of defendants, alleging that their products contained asbestos that contributed to her husband’s lung cancer and eventual passing. Mr. Rhoades had been employed as a mechanical repair worker on various jobsites, including on U.S. Navy Ships in Florida. The three remaining defendants, General Electric Company (GE), Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTC), and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NGC) each …

Continue Reading
Courtroom, Gavel And Law Books

Grant of Summary Judgment to Aluminum Plant Owner Reversed

Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals of Iowa

We previously reported on this matter involving the decedent, Charles Beverage, who was employed as an independent contractor at an aluminum plant between the 1950s and the mid-1970s. Following his death in October 2015, the decedent’s estate filed a products liability suit against several defendants, including Alcoa Inc., the aluminum plant’s owner, and Iowa-Illinois Taylor Insulation Inc., an installer of insulation, alleging that the decedent was exposed to asbestos during his employment and subsequently contracted mesothelioma. 

At that time, …

Continue Reading
Judge chamber with gavel

First Department Affirms Denial of Pipe Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment

Court: Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

In this asbestos action, decedent Rudolf Horvath alleged that he was exposed to asbestos from Bondstrand pipes manufactured by defendant, Ameron International, at a sewage plant in midtown Manhattan. In response, Ameron filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing the sewage plant referenced by decedent must have been the North River wastewater treatment plant, which did not exist until 1985 at a time when Ameron no longer manufactured Bondstrand pipe using asbestos.

The trial court …

Continue Reading