Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County
In this asbestos action, decedent Jose Munoz alleged that he was exposed to asbestos from caulk and plaster manufactured by defendant DAP.
DAP moved for summary judgment, arguing that “not all DAP caulks historically contained asbestos, no DAP plaster product contained asbestos, and that plaintiff’s causation for mesothelioma is insufficient.” In support of its motion, DAP submitted affidavits from a DAP former employee and a certified industrial hygienist. Plaintiff opposed DAP’s motion, citing plaintiff’s testimony identifying DAP products, as well …
Continue Reading